This topic contains 17 replies, has 9 voices, and was last updated by
Mason Worrell 1 year, 2 months ago.
| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
| Author | Posts |
| February 20, 2012 at 11:54 am #8703 | |
|
Jim Hunter |
This is what I’ve struggled with for the past few weeks when trying to determine if I’m going to get one or not. I love technology and neat stuff. I love games, but can the Vita really justify a day one purchase? [See the full post at: Why I'm Avoiding the Vita] Jim HunterQuote
|
| February 20, 2012 at 1:11 pm #8707 | |
|
David Hughes |
I’m the weakest target market for the Vita: I don’t travel much, I’ve never owned a dedicated handheld gaming system, and I already have access to both Android (Droid X2) and iOS (iPad 2) portable devices. Surprise, surprise: I won’t be buying one. My sole interest in it is as a gadget hound, but I can only imagine how quickly those analog sticks will get messed up unless you use a case – and that *really* defeats the purpose. David HughesQuote
|
| February 20, 2012 at 7:43 pm #8708 | |
|
JJ |
I’m not buying a Vita because my PSP hasn’t been used in about a year and a half. Sure I bought FF6 and recently charged my dead PSP to copy it there. Has it been played? Nope. I also copied my “free” copy of FF5 (thanks to my PS+ subscription) to it, but it sits unplayed as well. Uncharted: Golden Abyss looks amazing. And I’m sure I’d play it quite a bit. But that’s about it. I’m just not willing to pay $400 to play one game. Sure they might release another game I might want down the road. But by then the Vita will probably be $200, or maybe even $150. But even then, it would just be a fancy gadget that I carry around and say I’ll play but never do. There’s a reason I don’t have a DS anymore. It was just there. A Vita would also just “be there”. That’s not worth $350. JJQuote
|
| February 20, 2012 at 11:43 pm #8713 | |
|
Jason |
those to devices you mentioned aren’t gaming devices. I am getting a PS VITA because I am a gamer at heart and with the PS VITA I have access to the PSN store games on the go with real gaming controls and amazing graphics and will be able to pick up my game save on the PS3 or the other way around. Like for MLB The Show I can take my season with me. JasonQuote
|
| February 21, 2012 at 7:40 am #8730 | |
|
Jim Hunter |
The way smartphones are used today is a complete 180 from what they were previously used for. They’re not simply business devices for email and phone calls. They’re multifunction devices that also are capable of making phone calls. Most of the people that I know who own smart phones use that whole “makin’ calls” feature way less than everything else they can do, which includes playing games. Just about the only feature that the Vita doesn’t have in relation to smart phones is the phone call thing, but I’m guessing it won’t be long before there’s a Skype app for it. It’s got a microphone, it’s got cameras, it’s got Wifi (and sometimes 3G). You can check your email, browse the web, post on twitter, and play games. I’m not discounting the awesomeness of the tech – that’s my primary draw to it in the first place – but simply writing off other devices because Sony says it “wasn’t meant ” to compete with them isn’t a great place to be. The public is just eating their marketing and not thinking for themselves. There’s more parity between the Vita and existing smartphones than most people want to believe. At least the Vita has real controls instead of relying simply on the touch screen. Jim HunterQuote
|
| February 21, 2012 at 12:48 pm #8740 | |
|
Todd Fuller |
I firmly believe any device that plays games can be defined as a gaming device. PCs weren’t really considered gaming devices when I bought my first one. Hell, I had to MAKE my own first game just so I could play something (FYI, it sucked). Having said that, I really want to go out and purchase a Vita tomorrow. I wasn’t sold on the thumb sticks when I test drove a Vita a few weeks ago but it’s essentially what I really wanted to have when I bought my PSP years ago. Portable console gaming with a button layout that is intuitive and user friendly. I’m excited about the Vita’s prospects and if I traveled consistently I would have pre-ordered the day the were announced. There just aren’t many opportunities I have in which I would play Vita games. Todd FullerQuote
|
| February 22, 2012 at 2:00 pm #8777 | |
|
Jim Hunter |
This is pretty classic: Jim HunterQuote
|
| February 22, 2012 at 10:45 pm #8781 | |
|
Jason |
I see what your saying, there is skype on PS VITA though and apparently you can recieve text but not send them right know who knows what other apps will come it has tons of game features though obviously because it is primarily a games machine and the microphone is cool because you talk to people in multiplayer without a headset, you could be waiting in line, bored somewhere doing nothing, waiting for food at a restaraunt or just at home pick it up and own some people in Wipeout HD multiplayer with real controls or schedule a match with someone on a multiplayer game JasonQuote
|
| February 22, 2012 at 10:53 pm #8782 | |
|
Jason |
Ya your right any device that plays games can be considered a games device to a certain extent, you don’t have to only play it on the go thats just something that its for because its portable with the controls and screen I argue it would keep me away from watching a movie lol. JasonQuote
|
| February 23, 2012 at 9:03 am #8788 | |
|
Todd Fuller |
By the way, Jason I caved and bought a Vita yesterday. I talk about it on Rocketjump this week. I still don’t have many opportunities to play Vita games but I sure wanted to play Uncharted. Todd FullerQuote
|
| February 24, 2012 at 11:50 am #8836 | |
|
Mark |
I really, REALLY want a Vita. I played around with a demo unit and I think it’s a very slick device. I was impressed by the size and clarity of the screen along with actual thumbsticks instead of a nub you slide around. I can see this being a fantastic option for a lot of folks. I’m having a hard time justifying it, though, because I don’t see enough games for me. I’d love to have a Vita for MLB: The Show, particularly with the cloud save feature between the Vita and the PS3 version, but that’s a whole lotta cash for a game I’ll already have on the PS3. Ultimately, for me, it’s just not a great fit right now. All of the non-gaming stuff the Vita can do means nothing to me because I have an iPhone and iPad. I’d love to see it really start delivering games and game-specific feature which cry out, “BUY ME!!” MarkQuote
|
| February 24, 2012 at 12:15 pm #8837 | |
|
Jim Hunter |
I should probably buy one anyway to see if I’m right or not. Get some long game time on it instead of just some 5 minute impressions from a store. The tech-nerd in me wants it badly, but the economist says “YOU OUT YO MINDS!” Jim HunterQuote
|
| February 24, 2012 at 12:41 pm #8838 | |
|
Jack |
If you don’t want to buy it: don’t. You have said it isn’t for you, so don’t feel like you should because you feel pressured too. This article is about pre-lease impressions of the system and ecosystem, does it reallly matter ehat people think when it is actually is out? I too would quite like one, but I can’t justify it to myself for economic reasons and others you have mentioned. Just ignore me here though, I’m so drunk I can barely read. JackQuote
|
| February 24, 2012 at 12:43 pm #8839 | |
|
David Hughes |
I can’t personally justify it either. Plus, I have the added, um, incentive that my wife would kill me if I did buy one! David HughesQuote
|
| February 24, 2012 at 12:47 pm #8840 | |
|
Jack |
9h wow, I think that’s the fastest someone has posted after me. Manfg it’s like nearly 2AJM right now. JackQuote
|
| February 25, 2012 at 7:27 pm #8882 | |
|
JJ |
Oh how the turntables have… Uh, I got one today. I had $160 or so in credit plus a $25 gift card. My out of pocket for the Wi-fi with a 4GB memory card would have been about $95 or so. When I dumped the memory card and got the 3G (which comes with an 8GB card), my out of pocket was $117. I’m glad I shelled out the little extra. Its a sweet machine. Considering I left Target not 3 or 4 days ag and wasn’t sold. Having it in my house to play with at my leisure on my couch, its nice. Very nice. I still don’t know if I’ll pay for the one month of data to get the one month free (and Super Stardust). It seems like a ripoff. Having to pay $15 to get your free stuff. But I might. I must add that Gamestop trade ins values are much better than I remember. They beat Amazon for nearly everything. $50 for the PSP (because I ass getting a Vita), $85 for my old 120GB iPod, and a few dollars more for each game I traded in. I was blown away. JJQuote
|
| February 25, 2012 at 7:42 pm #8884 | |
|
David Hughes |
If I had stuff like that to trade in, I could see being tempted, but I probably have $50 tops in games I’m willing to trade. Also: DOES WILL-POWER HAVE NO MEANING ANYMORE? David HughesQuote
|
| February 26, 2012 at 3:04 am #8886 | |
|
Mason Worrell |
David, you say you’re the weakest market for the Vita…I may have you beat. I haven’t owned a handheld gaming device since the Gameboy Color, haven’t found them worth the money. I also don’t find smartphones or tablets worth the money: I use my phone so little I’ve brainstormed just cutting the 30 dollar month-by-month cricket plan off. I drive to both school and work, at work I’m not allowed any phone on my person, at school I have my laptop. At home I have my laptop and my console. No commute to any other places. My friends live multiple hrs away, and thus are all contacted via Skype or Trillian IM. I will fully admit to being on the outer fringe of gamers for this, but I’ve always found handhelds to be not worth the money due to the fact I’ve always been in a position to where owning one didn’t make any sense. Hell, I’m a use-case where even a smartphone or tablet makes no sense. The Vita is like “hey, have a device that does everything you have no need for it to do.” ~shrug~! Mason WorrellQuote
|





